Skip to content

Extend style guide "Use simple language" section #1624

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

StanFromIreland
Copy link
Member

@StanFromIreland StanFromIreland commented Aug 6, 2025

The diff is quite short, and I think it will explain better than a comment here. A section on gender neutrality may also be a good addition, there is in fact already one in the translation style guide.

Comment on lines +111 to +113
- Abbreviations, such as Latin "e.g." or "i.e.," or symbols, such as the
ampersand ('&'), where English words will do, such as
"for example", "that is" and "and," respectively.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't agree with discouraging '&'. It's relatively common, and helps distinguish items in a list, e.g. "Tom & Jerry and Barbie & Ken have both featured in major animated works".

Comment on lines +114 to +115
- Idioms, as they are often confusing to non-native speakers and
are difficult to translate.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've said elsewhere, but part of the draw of Python is that it has historically been less 'clinical'/corporate/dry than other languages, and silly examples (Monty Python) & idioms in prose are part of that. I think there's a fine balance between avoiding overuse and confusion and a prohibition: I would be sad to see this type of thing go.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants